Skip to main content

What it's Like to Crash a Motorcycle

“Damn it. John Burns thinks I’m a dick.”
That was one of the predominant thoughts going through my head as I slid down a Florida highway at 60 mph back in March.
It’s weird how the mind works. Time slows in a crash. Every tiny image burns into memory, so your brain can replay it over and over and over at night for the next who knows how many weeks.
In the moments before I crashed, I was riding the Harley-Davidson Street Rod along County Road 34 in central Florida. I’m not sure which county. The accident report simply records it as “County Code 61,” but the internet can’t agree on which county that is. Maybe I was in Indian River County; maybe I was in Suwannee County; maybe I was in Flagler County; I don’t know. I guess it doesn’t matter; I was somewhere. The road passing through that somewhere was long and straight – not the sort of place where one usually crashes – and the weather was perfect.

“My God, I am so happy,” I was thinking. “I am so incredibly lucky to be here – to live t…

The freedom of lane splitting


Not too long ago, I wrote an article suggesting that motorcyclists in the United Kingdom and the rest of the European Union are generally more skilled than their American counterparts. The reason behind this, I suggested, was the intense amount of testing that comes as a result of the EU's tiered licensing. In doing so, I set a little trap.

Unsurprisingly, a few people really didn't like the implication that things should change in America. A common counterargument to suggestions of implementing tiered licensing in the United States is the unwavering belief that bureaucracy is bad. As RideApart commenter Sayyed Bashir put it: "I don't think Americans want the government to get even more involved in telling them what they can or cannot do."

OK, fair enough. The United States is a country that was founded first and foremost on a healthy distrust of governmental overreach. We can wander deep into the rabbit hole of a discussion on the merits of paternal law and what obligations we have under the social contract into which all Americans are born... but I get it. I understand the philosophy behind these kinds of arguments. I don't necessarily agree with them in this case, but I do understand them.

They're the same arguments that people often make in defending their right to ride a motorcycle without a helmet. It's all about freedom and the protection of that ideology even in an aspect of life so seemingly mundane as traffic law.

So, here's the trap. If we accept the premise that tiered licensing and compulsory helmets are bad because they are averse to freedom—and freedom is good and bureaucracy is bad—why is lane splitting still not legally permissible in 49 states? That is a blatant infringement upon motorcyclists' freedom.

Called "filtering" in the United Kingdom (which I feel is a better word and sounds less adversarial), lane splitting is an immensely useful riding technique. One that, when applied intelligently, helps to make motorcycling safer, more rewarding, and more viable as a transportation choice. It's a freedom that British and Irish riders enjoy, as do the majority of motorcyclists worldwide.

But you don't have to filter if you don't want to. If you want to stay in a lane—perhaps you're uncomfortable with lane splitting, or you want to keep checking out that sexy person in the Volvo to your left—you have the freedom to do that as well. That's an important thing to remember about lane splitting: You don't have to do it. I've talked a lot about lane splitting over the years, and often when I've seen arguments against it they seem to be centered on a belief (perhaps fear is a better word) that if lane splitting is decriminalized across the United States it will somehow become obligatory.

Of course, that's not expressly stated; it seems implied. As if the person thinks he or she will no longer be allowed to command a lane in a lane-splitting-legal world. Some wild dystopia will ensue: a world in which cars will be allowed to drive right into and over motorcycles, and responding police officers will simply look at the crumpled motorcyclist and say, "Well, he should have been lane splitting."

And if that were the case I could understand being against lane splitting. Some people just aren't comfortable with it. Not all of us want to spend our time weaving and hurtling through traffic like those nut-jobs in Brazil. That's true as well in countries where lane splitting is permissible. I've encountered riders in Europe who have not trusted their ability to navigate between cars. It's not for everybody; just as motorcycling itself isn't for everybody.

The point is that the freedom to decide one way or another should exist. Just because you're afraid of not being able to do something doesn't necessarily mean others should be prevented from doing it—especially in the United States. If we want to be free to ride any size motorcycle, helmet-less, with little to no training, we should definitely be free to ride that motorcycle between lanes of traffic.

The good news is that over the past few years we've seen growing support for the idea of extending that freedom. The American Motorcyclist Association now supports lane splitting. I'll admit I don't have a lot of love for the AMA (it took quite a while to extend its support), but it's good to see the organization now standing on the right side of this issue.

If the AMA is willing to put some of its political and financial muscle behind lane splitting, we may actually see it allowed in the not too distant future, which is important. Not only from a philosophical point of view, but a practical one.

(Originally published on RideApart)

Comments

  1. "... a belief (perhaps fear is a better word) that if lane splitting is decriminalized across the United States it will somehow become obligatory."

    As a new rider in Florida (one 15-minute ride), that's sort of how I feel about lane-splitting. I know it has a lot of benefits and I would totally vote for it to be legal if offered a vote, but the thought of squeezing in between moving vehicles makes me feel uneasy.

    By the way, I intended to post the following a year or so ago (when I discovered your blog), but I was too busy/lazy to sign in to post a comment:

    Your posts from before you had a motorcycle were inspirational to me. I lived with this abnormal need/desire to ride a motorcycle since 2011. I finally bought a motorcycle in January at 30 years old.

    Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The problem with lane splitting is that if you allow it motorcycles will have every advantage in congestion and car drivers will lose their shit as we get an unfair advantage. Maybe. Who knows? Why car drivers care if we get squashed splitting is beyond me as they try to run us down every other which way.
    I have lived in lane splitting/filtering jurisdictions and I do it when I want to, but I have never been a slave to social pressure.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I lane split like a motherpucker and I never have a problem. The only problem is when I get outside of California and remember I'm not allowed to lane split. (Phoenix traffic sucks, by the way.) Anywho, there are plenty of times I make the choice in CA to wait on the splitting, even when other bikes are going by.
    As far as car drivers getting angry, let's think this through. Your driving your car and you hear a motorcycle coming by. You're so angry you become willing to harm another human being, perhaps face prison time, and as minimum, damage your own property just to keep someone else from getting home before you do. Not realistic. Every now and then I have a car ease over to stop me. And every now and then those same cars get some filthy words as I pass or maybe some spit on their windshield. (Modular Helmets Rule!)
    Alls I'm sayin' is that it would really lighten the amount of vehicles on the roads and shorten traffic times if motorcycles could split in every state.
    Smooches,
    Sash The Rude Biker Chick

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ride review: Harley-Davidson XL 883 L (aka Sportster SuperLow)

Yes, as a matter of fact, it is like riding a tractor.
That's the criticism so consistently levied against Harley-Davidson motorcycles: that there is something agrarian to the experience. And I can now say from personal experience that all those critics are right. But I can also say those critics are leaving out a key piece of information, which is this:
TRACTORS ARE FUCKING AWESOME!!!
It's a tractor that hurtles forward with roller-coaster intensity, a tractor that goes really fast, a tractor that makes you feel like Brock Lesnar in a children's ball pit. A tractor from the Land of Bad-Ass, with which you can sow the seeds of awesomeness.
But let me back up a bit...
A few days ago, I decided to take the day off, solely for the purpose of getting a chance to ride around and finally make use of the free breakfast coupon sent to me by Thunder Road. As I was gearing up, I suddenly decided that since I was already heading west, I might as well push a few miles further and che…

Ride review: Yamaha XV950 / Star Bolt

Imitation, Charles Caleb Colton famously noted, is the sincerest form of flattery. If that's true, the flattery the Harley-Davidson Iron 883 receives from Yamaha's XV950 is enough to make one blush. Put the two bikes side by side, and the inspiration for the latter is undeniable. Yamaha claims its bike has a "new neo retro Japanese look," but that's clearly just nonsense –– lorem ipsom that was used instead of "totally looks like a Harley-Davidson Iron 883."
Certainly the XV950 –– known as the Star Bolt in the United States –– isn't the first example of a Japanese OEM adhering faithfully to the styling cues of America's best-known motorcycle manufacturer. The orthodox members of the Church of Jesus Harley Latter-day Davidson write these bikes off as "wannabes," and tend to be pretty dismissive of anyone who would dare consider purchasing one. But I'm going to commit blasphemy here and tell you that the XV950 is unquestionably the …

Ride review: Triumph Bonneville

"OK," I said. "I want one." "Well, you know, maybe you should ask your wife first." "She loves Triumphs," I said. "Still, Chris. You should give it a think. Go home, discuss it with your wife, give yourself a chance to think clearly. After all, this is one of Triumph's most popular models; there's plenty of stock available."
The voice of reason in that conversation was Drew, the salesman at Bevan Motorcycles. He was doing his best to talk some sense into me after my test ride of the 2014 Triumph Bonneville. I was wild-eyed and yammering like a teenage boy who has touched boobies for the first time. This, my friends, is what the Bonneville does to you. It is an instantly rideable, instantly enjoyable, instantly lovable motorcycle that surprises you in just how good a simple motorcycle can be.

The Bonneville, of course, is a storied machine that's been around in one form or another for 55 years. It is a classic. Partially b…